home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
kermit.columbia.edu
/
kermit.columbia.edu.tar
/
kermit.columbia.edu
/
newsgroups
/
misc.20021006-20030409
/
000312_not-a-real-address@usa.net_Sun Feb 16 13:48:27 EST 2003.msg
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
2003-04-08
|
2KB
|
34 lines
Article: 14108 of comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Path: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu!panix!newsfeed.media.kyoto-u.ac.jp!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!sn-xit-03!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!news.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: those who know me have no need of my name <not-a-real-address@usa.net>
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.kermit.misc
Subject: Re: Is Kermit SSH the same as openssh?
Date: 16 Feb 2003 00:24:21 GMT
Organization: earthfriends
Message-ID: <m1fzqp6pnw.gnus@usa.net>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090016 (Oort Gnus v0.16) XEmacs/21.4 (Military
Intelligence)
References: <d634efd8.0302121631.375931d8@posting.google.com> <3E4B3873.7050809@nyc.rr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Complaints-To: abuse@supernews.com
Lines: 16
Xref: newsmaster.cc.columbia.edu comp.protocols.kermit.misc:14108
in comp.protocols.kermit.misc i read:
>gsoapacct@yahoo.com wrote:
>> I am having to decide which is better, openssh or Kermit, for sshd on
>> a Solaris system. Is there even any differences? What do you think?
>
>Kermit does not provide SSHD capabilities.
nor ssh (client) capabilities, except in k95 (bit of an anachronistic name
now). it would be excellent if it did those things, but it doesn't, so you
must install openssh anyway. i suggest using kermit to control the client
session, as that provides in-band kermit protocol, i.e., it adds to what
ssh alone can do.
--
bringing you boring signatures for 17 years